Wednesday 29 January 2014

Art and Life Three






Sundog Rising!
Reflections on living the life literary by the Urban Sundog





As I Am Entertained, Therefore I Am.
Part Three







Our Premise So Far: Due to its overwhelming presence in our lives, higher than at any other point in history, people today demonstrate a tendency to define themselves in terms of the media by which they are entertained. I decided that wasn’t necessarily such a bad idea, as art offers an exploration of the deepest reflection man has to offer on his world. But does subjecting yourself to endless marathons of The Simpsons or Sex In The City qualify as exposing yourself to art?





Now I’m in trouble. I got into this argument because I complained too many people were taking their entertainment content too seriously! Have I put myself in the reverse position from where I started out? Am I now saying your entertainment choices — and you, by extension — are inferior because they might not be up to my completely subjective opinion of what qualifies as worthwhile art or not?





This is why so many people hate philosophy. No matter how you argue things, you always eventually end up talking yourself into a corner.

I claimed at the beginning of this series that no one should be quick to judge another person based solely on their choice of favourite movies, books, or television programs. I still believe that. To get out of contradicting myself in the deeper exploration, it’s time for a reexamination of my key statement.

As I am Entertained, therefore I am.

The crux of the matter is the passive structure of that concept. I am entertained. We’re trying to extend Rene Descartes’s famous “cogito ergo sum,” but we’re not saying “as I entertain, therefore I am.” I’ll leave that one to Martha Stewart.





No the point is, we’re talking about developing our personas through something that happens to us, rather than something we actively do. Beyond changing the station with the remote.

The content of any entertainment experience, artsy or otherwise, is what it is. People will like what they like. Certainly, producers constantly steering the available choices towards the lowest common denominator in the name of making a buck is not a healthy trend for the culture’s overall well being. But ultimately there is absolutely nothing wrong with sitting down with an episode of The Simpsons or even Sex In The City. There are too many other influences still at work to lay aim at the content of prime time television as being the sole progenitor of the increasingly crass and uncivil society we live in.

Entertainment content is as entertainment content does. The problem comes when people only accept what is thrown at them in a passive manner. Being defined solely by outside forces is no way to develop a solid set of existential credentials for your self.





Whatever your viewing, reading, or listening habits are, it is always necessary to think about what you watch, read, or hear, to build a legitimate individual persona. Unless you’re blindly happy being one of the faceless masses of our culture’s army of consumers. I don’t even want to think about getting into the issue of those who don’t want to think versus those who do, and how many there are in either camp at any given moment. A statement which makes me feel like I’m spinning in place again, but what the hell.

We cannot avoid being affected unwillingly by our environments, but we can always think about who we are within them. Change has to come from within. Working from there, we can make good or bad decisions about what we choose to draw from our endless hours of entertainment. Insights into life as drawn from The Simpsons and Sex In The City are just as legitimate as those drawn from James Joyce’s Ulysses.

And we should all agree to lighten up a little when we choose to speak about our entertainment-derived decisions. Then such conversations can become a good deal more … well, entertaining again.

So what it comes down to is, no matter what you read, watch or listen to, you still gotta think before you are. Doh!







*******

REALITY FICTION UPDATE!

And what is Reality Fiction, you may well ask?

Simple. The concept of the Reality Television Series translated to the printed page. 40 characters from my backlog of generally unpublished material are gathered together to compete in a different theme each Episode, with one or two characters being eliminated each sequence until there are only two left to fight it out in the final. The winner gets a short novel of their own as the grand prize.

But somehow, things always seem to go horribly wrong ...

What’s happening now? 


You are cordially invited
to the wedding of
The Ponytail Princess
to
Miss Scintillisha Evans-Holyrood
on the shores of Poor Mademoiselle Lake
beginning Friday, January 31st, 2014
(and yes, we know they’re both girls.)


A totally unique Reality Fiction Too! interlude.

Continuing Friday at:  realficone.blogspot.ca






REALITY FICTION TOO! EPISODES TO DATE

EPISODE TWENTY:     EXISTENTIALISM
Face the Hangman
EPISODE NINETEEN:     ABDUCTION
Abduction/Apperception
EPISODE EIGHTEEN:     MELODRAMA
“Terror in Tarnation! A Thrilling Narrative in Three Acts”
EPISODE SEVENTEEN:     POETRY
“landescapes”
EPISODE SIXTEEN:     SILLY EUROPEAN SPY SPOOF (DUBBED)
“Diet Ray of the Stars!”
EPISODE FIFTEEN:     EROTIC SUPERNATURAL ROMANCE     
“The Shadow of Her Passion”
EPISODE FOURTEEN:     FLYING:
“Sky Calling”
EPISODE THIRTEEN:     SLAPSTICK:
“The Phantom of the Werewolf”
EPISODE TWELVE:     DAIRY FARMING:
“Early One Morning”
EPISODE ELEVEN:     BURROUGHS:
“Chapter Nine”
EPISODE TEN:     WEREWOLVES:
“The Silver Solution”
EPISODE NINE:     WRESTLING:
“Suckerslam XIV”
EPISODE EIGHT:     JANE AUSTEN ROMANCE:
“The Proud and the Senseless”
EPISODE SEVEN:     THE JAZZ AGE:
“The Bucky-Dusky-Ruby Red Hop!”
EPISODE SIX:     SUBMISSION:
“Re-Org”
EPISODE FIVE:     MASQUERADE:
“The Eyes Behind the Mask”
EPISODE FOUR:     SELF HELP:
“Sausage Stew for the Slightly Overweight Presents:
Some Several Suggestions Guaranteeing Success for the Mildly Neurotic”
EPISODE THREE:     NUDIST:
“If You Have To Ask ...”
EPISODE TWO:     FRENCH BEDROOM FARCE:
Un Nuit a Fifi’s!
EPISODE ONE:     STEAMPUNK:
“The Chase of the Purple Squid!”

A J.H.B. Original!

Wednesday 22 January 2014

I Am Entertained, Therefore - Part Two






Sundog Rising!
Reflections on living the life literary by the Urban Sundog





As I Am Entertained, Therefore I Am.
Part Two



Thinkerbell



Our Premise So Far: Following up on Baudrillard’s System of Objects, modern western man takes the variety of choice in his consumption of material goods and entertainment as a basic right that serves to enhance his personal status and definition through his discrimination in making the selections he does. Question which movies or music he likes and you question his being. As a result some people take casual literary or film discussions far too seriously. To the point of becoming abusive.





This week’s question: Those insecure idiots aside, is it such a bad thing to define your essence through your choices in art?

Does your taste in books, movies, music and television shows define the person you become? Or does that taste develop as a result of the person you are?

I think mostly the second, but not without a touch of the first as well. 

As I mentioned last time, more hours per day can be spent entertaining yourself to death than could possibly have been conceived of even thirty years ago. Entertainment 24 hours a day 7 days a week has never been present in such wild abundance and variety before. Faced with such a wealth of selection, you have to be discriminating in what you choose to spend your time on. You don’t watch the first TV show you walk in on when there’s a hundred other stations, and you don’t pick up the first book you find in Chapters and only buy that one either.





No, you PVR your shows and get back to them when you damn well please, and you narrow your search for a good book down subject by section by alphabetical grouping by shelf until you find something worth reading. Assuming you didn’t have a list of titles already made when you walked into the store.

Most of these selections are based on what you’ve liked before. Depending on what you grew up watching or reading, you contrive certain tastes and dislikes. Who you are obviously influences your final selections.

But in one sense, you do start off with a finite field to choose from influencing your development in what is available to you when you first set off into the welcoming arms of the media. I obviously had a much more restrained range to choose from when I started reading in the nineteen sixties than a new reader does today. Today’s barrage of availability must make it trickier to find yourself. But once you’ve got the general idea, that experience heavily defines future choices. As I just said, who you are influences your selection. But by the time you pass your formative years, how much has your early exposure to media with the particular options available to you also influenced the person you have become?





I’d say it’s a cycle that feeds upon itself. Opting for comic books over the Bobbsey Twins when I was seven definitely defined a lot of what my teenage years were going to be like. (Not that I never read another Bobbsey Twins novel.) And inculcating a love for comics as a central tenet of my developmental being still plays a major role in what I will or will not enjoy in my entertainment choices today.





Therefore, how viable a basis does developing into the person you are due to your entertainment choices represent? Are we cheapening ourselves somehow, when we say “I’m the man I am today because I started watching Dr. Who when I was six years old!”? And still do, fifty years later? (A practically unique example, but still …)





Obviously your worth as a person can be measured by the depth of your perception of and interaction with the world. Who would argue that beneath the surface banality of so much media there are no examples of the most insightful art produced in the last century?  You have to dig for it, but isn’t that the point of becoming a discerning consumer? If it’s a matter of arguing that the quality of the person you are is dependent upon the quality of the material forming your perceptions, then books, movies, music and yes, even television can supply a perfectly nurturing environment within which to explore your better outlook.

So where does that leave us?

Your consumption of art within the entertainment world contributes to your development as an individual. This is not necessarily a bad thing as art can aspire to providing us with the greatest, comprehensive and most aesthetic explanations of our existence we have available to us. A valid field to draw from, indeed.

Hold it hold it hold it, though. Who let art into the discussion so sneakily? What about the guy who sits around on the couch all day watching reruns of The Simpsons? Or the woman hopelessly addicted to Sex in the City?

There’s a bit more thinking to be done here yet …

(to be continued)







*******

REALITY FICTION UPDATE!

And what is Reality Fiction, you may well ask?

Simple. The concept of the Reality Television Series translated to the printed page. 40 characters from my backlog of generally unpublished material are gathered together to compete in a different theme each Episode, with one or two characters being eliminated each sequence until there are only two left to fight it out in the final. The winner gets a short novel of their own as the grand prize.

But somehow, things always seem to go horribly wrong ...

What’s happening now? 

As if this blog isn’t bad enough, Reality Fiction Too goes all Existential as well this week, in Episode Twenty, starting Friday. Will the characters discover that they really exist, fictionally, metafictionally, or at all? Or will they only find that everything to date has been some kind of big joke? (Other than the obvious.)

Continuing Friday at:  realficone.blogspot.ca






REALITY FICTION TOO! EPISODES TO DATE

EPISODE NINETEEN:     ABDUCTION
Abduction/Apperception
EPISODE EIGHTEEN:     MELODRAMA
“Terror in Tarnation! A Thrilling Narrative in Three Acts”
EPISODE SEVENTEEN:     POETRY
“landescapes”
EPISODE SIXTEEN:     SILLY EUROPEAN SPY SPOOF (DUBBED)
“Diet Ray of the Stars!”
EPISODE FIFTEEN:     EROTIC SUPERNATURAL ROMANCE     
“The Shadow of Her Passion”
EPISODE FOURTEEN:     FLYING:
“Sky Calling”
EPISODE THIRTEEN:     SLAPSTICK:
“The Phantom of the Werewolf”
EPISODE TWELVE:     DAIRY FARMING:
“Early One Morning”
EPISODE ELEVEN:     BURROUGHS:
“Chapter Nine”
EPISODE TEN:     WEREWOLVES:
“The Silver Solution”
EPISODE NINE:     WRESTLING:
“Suckerslam XIV”
EPISODE EIGHT:     JANE AUSTEN ROMANCE:
“The Proud and the Senseless”
EPISODE SEVEN:     THE JAZZ AGE:
“The Bucky-Dusky-Ruby Red Hop!”
EPISODE SIX:     SUBMISSION:
“Re-Org”
EPISODE FIVE:     MASQUERADE:
“The Eyes Behind the Mask”
EPISODE FOUR:     SELF HELP:
“Sausage Stew for the Slightly Overweight Presents:
Some Several Suggestions Guaranteeing Success for the Mildly Neurotic”
EPISODE THREE:     NUDIST:
“If You Have To Ask ...”
EPISODE TWO:     FRENCH BEDROOM FARCE:
Un Nuit a Fifi’s!
EPISODE ONE:     STEAMPUNK:
“The Chase of the Purple Squid!”

A J.H.B. Original!

Wednesday 15 January 2014

Art and Existence One






Sundog Rising!
Reflections on living the life literary by the Urban Sundog





As I Am Entertained, Therefore I Am.





There are some people I will not discuss books or movies with.

There has to be an agreement up front. If I’m going to have this sort of discussion with a person, although this should be left unsaid, we have to agree that we’re talking about only books and movies. Not something life shattering, like religion or politics. And we agree to differ. It is no disaster if I don’t like your books, and equally no disaster if you don’t like my movies.





But an alarmingly large number of people don’t play by these rules. When dealing with these sorts, the best I seem to receive is having any disagreement I might express regarding their likes and dislikes utterly ignored, as if I hadn’t spoken at all. And at worst, I am shouted down, even though I never raise my voice myself, and accused of inherent perversity.

Come to think of it, the discussions I have with people concerning religion and politics practically never become so abusive as those concerning literature and film.

Why is that?

This is obviously an extension of dealing with those annoying people who always have to be right, regardless of the subject of discussion. But why?





Because they’re insecure. Fragile egos incapable of dealing with a concept that does not support their own self image. But why does the discussion of “entertainment” per se spread that syndrome so far and wide? Include music and television in that definition along with books and movies.

I think French philosopher Jean Baudrillard was one of the first thinkers on the right track towards addressing this phenomenon in his 1968 book, The System of Objects. Paraphrasing mercilessly, I say Baudrillard saw western society as becoming the most materialistic in the history of the planet. But even though we have so much, we do not define ourselves as satiated. We define ourselves by our need. Our need supersedes the actual acquisition of things. The point is, we’re so rich, we can always afford to buy something more. So it is the object we have not yet acquired that is important, not what we already have.





As you might imagine, this doesn’t lead to a great deal of satisfaction with life …

Further to the wealth in our society, it is not sufficient to our needs only to be supplied with an object to fill those desires. We must have choice! A variety of styles and examples of the same object, so the specific selection we make of a car, house, book, movie, song, or whatever says something about the person we are. We define ourselves as individuals within the social context by what our personal choices made regarding objects  in filling our insatiable need state in how one example of that object relates to another.

As George Carlin figured out around the same time, we’re all defined by our “stuff.”





My clothes are nicer than your clothes, my car is more expensive than your car, my house has been decorated in better taste than yours, etc., etc. So therefore it really isn’t a big leap from this to also thinking what movies I watch or books I read are also more important than yours. Because they’re all defining me, dammit! And I’m too insecure to accept any questioning of that definition.

Add to this mix the fact that entertainment, 24/7, has never been more available in greater variety to any society before than ours. More hours per day can be spent entertaining yourself to death than could possibly have been conceived of even thirty years ago. Any activity you spend so much time on naturally becomes then the foundation on which you define yourself most essentially. I watch, therefore I am. Except it’s even more than that. For the true media potato, in all his or her utter passivity, it is entirely true to say “I am Entertained, therefore I am.” So watch what you say about my choices, buster.

This is going to require more thought …

(to be continued)






*******

REALITY FICTION UPDATE!

And what is Reality Fiction, you may well ask?

Simple. The concept of the Reality Television Series translated to the printed page. 40 characters from my backlog of generally unpublished material are gathered together to compete in a different theme each Episode, with one or two characters being eliminated each sequence until there are only two left to fight it out in the final. The winner gets a short novel of their own as the grand prize.

But somehow, things always seem to go horribly wrong ...

What’s happening now? 

The Alien Abduction Episode morphs into McKenzie Telstar’s apotheosis. More philosophy, this time with Gottfried Wilhem Leibniz and Hobson the Hangman. Get cosmic with RealFic Too!

Continuing Friday at:  realficone.blogspot.ca






REALITY FICTION TOO! EPISODES TO DATE

EPISODE NINETEEN:     ABDUCTION
Abduction/Apperception
EPISODE EIGHTEEN:     MELODRAMA
“Terror in Tarnation! A Thrilling Narrative in Three Acts”
EPISODE SEVENTEEN:     POETRY
“landescapes”
EPISODE SIXTEEN:     SILLY EUROPEAN SPY SPOOF (DUBBED)
“Diet Ray of the Stars!”
EPISODE FIFTEEN:     EROTIC SUPERNATURAL ROMANCE     
“The Shadow of Her Passion”
EPISODE FOURTEEN:     FLYING:
“Sky Calling”
EPISODE THIRTEEN:     SLAPSTICK:
“The Phantom of the Werewolf”
EPISODE TWELVE:     DAIRY FARMING:
“Early One Morning”
EPISODE ELEVEN:     BURROUGHS:
“Chapter Nine”
EPISODE TEN:     WEREWOLVES:
“The Silver Solution”
EPISODE NINE:     WRESTLING:
“Suckerslam XIV”
EPISODE EIGHT:     JANE AUSTEN ROMANCE:
“The Proud and the Senseless”
EPISODE SEVEN:     THE JAZZ AGE:
“The Bucky-Dusky-Ruby Red Hop!”
EPISODE SIX:     SUBMISSION:
“Re-Org”
EPISODE FIVE:     MASQUERADE:
“The Eyes Behind the Mask”
EPISODE FOUR:     SELF HELP:
“Sausage Stew for the Slightly Overweight Presents:
Some Several Suggestions Guaranteeing Success for the Mildly Neurotic”
EPISODE THREE:     NUDIST:
“If You Have To Ask ...”
EPISODE TWO:     FRENCH BEDROOM FARCE:
Un Nuit a Fifi’s!
EPISODE ONE:     STEAMPUNK:
“The Chase of the Purple Squid!”

A J.H.B. Original!

Wednesday 8 January 2014

2013 in Review






Sundog Rising!
Reflections on living the life literary by the Urban Sundog




Reading, 2013







Year end top ten lists! Or fifteen, whatever. One of the ultimate self-indulgences, with little or no meaning outside of your own experience! Of course I take part.

What does it mean really, to say here’s my Top Fifteen Reading List for 2013? Did I read all the books published in 2013? I’m not certain I read any book published in 2013. What I did do was read 114 books in 2013, drawn from a variety of years — centuries even — and genres, in a grouping unique to my experience. Did anyone else read the exact same 114 books in 2013 that I did? I seriously doubt it.

So when I give you my general opinions on how good a read was or wasn’t concerning this specific list of 114 books, really the only standard these statements can be held against is the list itself, which no one else experienced. Qualitatively, these ratings are meaningless outside of my personal reading. But nevertheless, you as a different reader may or may not take away some recommendations of what to dabble in, given my reactions. Let’s dive into the befuddling waters.





Just at the end of the year, I read Talking About Detective Fiction, by P.D. James, a non-fiction treatise on the art of writing mysteries. She states that setting, characterization, narrative and structure are necessary to any good novel, mystery or otherwise; and “all four must be held in creative tension and the whole story written in compelling language”. As fine a definition of a successful book as any I’ve read. So let’s see where the four novels I actually finished reading in 2013 but wished I hadn’t fell short against these criteria. Here’s my four worst reads of the year. In no particular order.

The Four Fingers of Death, by Rick Moody. It could have been so good! It should have been so good! A four fingered bodiless hand crawling out of the desert to cause havoc … But it was just … sad. Characterization was strained, and the book was too overwritten to maintain creative tension.

Red Shirts, by John Scalzi. Such a great joke! Characters wearing red uniforms on a starship not unlike the Enterprise begin recognizing they’re always the ones who die on away missions, while the insanely reckless central characters live on. Ruined by a wandering, formless structure, bad dialogue and no creative tension.

Cryptonomicon, by Neal Stephenson. You ever find yourself trapped in a ridiculously long novel by the compulsion that it just has to come together at some point? And then it doesn’t? So you claim it was a good book anyway, because you devoted so much damn time to it. Not this one! Misogynistic characters, wandering plot, and again no creative tension. You know exactly what happens at the end two hundred pages before you get there. On the plus side, I have read other novels by Neal Stephenson that I did enjoy very much. This just wasn’t one of them. But I admire his research — you have to, he hits you over the head with it — and especially his description of the Philippines. Very real to life. Unlike his portrayal of General MacArthur, which barely rises to the status of political cartoon and jars unforgivably against his genuine portrayal of the islands.





A Dry Spell, by Susie Moloney. Good premise and setting, a failure in structure and overwritten practically into somnolence. At one point, something like six pages is devoted to someone dropping a card, someone else picking it up, and someone else seeing the second person pick it up. This is supposed to be a horror novel! Pick up the pace, and give us a major event half way through to keep us hooked, creative writing 101!



Okay, now that I’ve got that out of my system …

I had five picks on my best of list for Nonfiction in 2013. Again, in no particular order …





Josephine: The Hungry Heart, by Jean-Claude Baker and Chris Chase. I’ve been a big Josephine Baker fan ever since I discovered her in high school, thanks to a song by the original line up of the band Sailor. Her story and life were amazing, and this book also captures the spirit of an era I was particularly interested in during 2013.

Art and Physics, by David Schlain. I read a couple of books by this writer, lent to me by my brother-in-law Brian. This one struck the deepest chord, although I don’t think it finishes as well as it develops through the first two thirds. Linking how two disparate sections of society view the history of science, with, surprisingly enough, the artist often anticipating where the scientist will go next.

The Hare With The Amber Eyes, by Edward DeWaal. A fascinating social and cultural history, all tied together by a collection of tiny Japanese figurines.

American Eve, by Paula Uruburu. The story of the Gibson Girl, Evelyn Nesbit. A worthy companion to the book on Josephine, with, surprisingly, even more drama.





Coco Chanel, by Justine Picardie. Another amazing woman, this one blazing her own path through society and culture to leave an immortal name. And another artist who got the job done, to my eternal admiration.



And finally, my top fifteen favourite fiction reads in 2013. From Number Fifteen through to the top book of the year. For me, anyway.

Number Fifteen: The Buddha of Brewer Street, by Michael Dobbs. Sometimes it takes me awhile to get around to an author everyone else has been reading for years. I read a few of Dobbs’s books this year, and liked this one the best. What happens when the search for the next Dalai Lama begins.

Number Fourteen: A Certain Justice, by P.D. James. There is such a rich panorama of writers in our culture to draw from! I find it an absolute treat that you can wait until you know it’s the right time to read someone, before really settling down to enjoy them. I’d read a couple of James books before certainly, but something tipped me off that this was the year to read P.D. James. Don’t have a clue what, but I’m glad the instinct registered. So I plowed through the first ten Adam Dalgleish novels between June and December. I was surprised by the range and variety of the pieces of the ongoing saga. This one, set in the world of lawyers and with an ending that doesn’t entirely conform to expectations, particularly stood out for me.

Number Thirteen: Poor Things, by Alasdair Grey. It’s always satisfying when I go looking for a pronouncedly strange novel, and the Library actually has it. A tour-de-force ramble on the Frankenstein theme, complete with the author’s own illustrations.





Number Twelve: Little Green Men, by Christopher Buckley. A wonderful follow up to my extensive research and theorizing on the phenomenon for 2012’s blog. I don’t know about the rest of his audience, but I find the story utterly convincing. There are so few genuinely good humour writers out there, too.

Number Eleven: Echo, by Jack McDevitt. My favourite of the current science fiction authors still worth reading. Rich characterization, and well structured plot development, to refer back to P.D. James for a moment. Which isn’t such a stretch, since McDevitt’s books are essentially mysteries with a futuristic Holmes/Watson team solving the enigmas we can only hope to aspire to at this moment in time.

Number Ten: Norwegian Wood, by Haruki Murakami. I started reading Murakami in 2011, with Kafka on the Shore, and he took my number one spot on this list last year with The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle. On a roll, I read another six of his novels this year. This one, his most notorious? sensational? biggest hit? — so popular in Japan he fled the country because of its success for awhile — I didn’t really expect to like. I was right. I loved it.





Number Nine: One Of Our Thursdays Is Missing, by Jasper Fforde. The sixth in the Thursday Next series. It is mind boggling to me how many concepts this man can fit on a single page. And having a certain preference for metafiction myself these days, it’s no surprise I find Fforde a kindred spirit. Or is that ffind?

Number Eight: Anno Dracula: Dracula Cha Cha Cha, by Kim Newman. As Dracula was the first of the books I declared really great in my life — back when I was about five — I have naturally been somewhat obsessed with the vampire industry growing up around the Count in so many cultures since the nineteen-sixties, and beyond. What a delight to find an author even more obsessed than me. Half the fun reading these books for the dedicated fan such as myself is catching the references before they have to be explained to you. But I was overwhelmed to discover the title refers to a genuine song that I could download from I-Tunes!





Number Seven: The House of Mirth, by Edith Wharton. A lady what still gets it. See my blog entry for November 27th, 2013.

Number Six: Shroud for a Nightingale, by P.D. James. The Adam Dalgleish novel that resonates with me the strongest so far. The reason? She captures the character and world of the nurses so powerfully, I am in a total state of belief from the first chapter. A writer making fiction more than real. The mystery was a bonus.

Number Five: Dr. Thorne, by Anthony Trollope. Someone else I had to wait until the right time to read. Now I read a book by him every three months. I suspect his bibliography may outlive me. And I have to say 2013 was officially the year I decided I like Trollope better than Dickens. If you haven’t read Trollope, you may be in for a wonderful surprise …





Number Four: Anno Dracula: The Bloody Red Baron, by Kim Newman. Yes, two books in the same series by the same author scoring high! My son gave me this one for Christmas last year, and I couldn’t believe how well the man nailed it. Or staked it. Either way, the Germans sending giant vampire bat/werewolf changelings into the air to dogfight during World War One is an inspired addition to the entire mythos.

Number Three: Embassytown, by China Mieville. The top three this year up the exercise to a different level. Mieville can be a supremely cerebral author in his conceptualizations, and the world and culture he gives us in this book are astounding. I was e-mailing my son discussing the concepts in this book for weeks. A young human girl becomes, physically, a metaphor in an alien race’s language. After that, things get strange …





Number Two: Summertime, All The Cats Are Bored, by Phillipe Georget. Gilles Sebag, you the man! See my entry for September 18th, 2013, debuting this blog.





Number One: The same author taking the top spot two years straight, 1Q84, by Haruki Murakami. Remember what I said about claiming you like a long book because it took you so long to read it? At 1,157 pages, 1Q84 might justifiably be considered too much of a good thing. But when I hit page 600 and realized I couldn’t put the book down, I knew I had a winner. Synthesizes many of the themes of his other novels into one magnum opus. And kudos to the translators. The novel was published as three separate novels in Japanese, and two different writers, Jay Rubin and Philip Gabriel, made them work as one mammoth achievement in English. An amazing job.





2013 was a great year for reading.




Now I have to ask the question: does anything I just wrote offend anyone? Does slamming some novels that might have really worked for you and exalting others that you can’t see the point of at all hit you at your deepest level of being? Because that’s the first new topic I’m tackling in 2014.

As I Am Entertained, Therefore I Am.






*******

REALITY FICTION UPDATE!

And what is Reality Fiction, you may well ask?

Simple. The concept of the Reality Television Series translated to the printed page. 40 characters from my backlog of generally unpublished material are gathered together to compete in a different theme each Episode, with one or two characters being eliminated each sequence until there are only two left to fight it out in the final. The winner gets a short novel of their own as the grand prize.

But somehow, things always seem to go horribly wrong ...

What’s happening now? 





In the three weeks since this blog last appeared, there’s been developments aplenty! Despite not “getting” Poetry, the bulk of the Contestants comported themselves well in Episode Seventeen, and then moved happily on to Melodrama in Episode Eighteen, an event rife with startling revelations! With consequences in our remaining characters’ development that will resonate throughout the rest of the book beyond that Episode. And now? What’s on deck? Alien Abduction! Reality Fiction Too! Asserting a new Oddness for 2014!

Continuing Friday at:  realficone.blogspot.ca







REALITY FICTION TOO! EPISODES TO DATE

EPISODE EIGHTEEN:     MELODRAMA
“Terror in Tarnation! A Thrilling Narrative in Three Acts”
EPISODE SEVENTEEN:     POETRY
“landescapes”
EPISODE SIXTEEN:     SILLY EUROPEAN SPY SPOOF (DUBBED)
“Diet Ray of the Stars!”
EPISODE FIFTEEN:     EROTIC SUPERNATURAL ROMANCE     
“The Shadow of Her Passion”
EPISODE FOURTEEN:     FLYING:
“Sky Calling”
EPISODE THIRTEEN:     SLAPSTICK:
“The Phantom of the Werewolf”
EPISODE TWELVE:     DAIRY FARMING:
“Early One Morning”
EPISODE ELEVEN:     BURROUGHS:
“Chapter Nine”
EPISODE TEN:     WEREWOLVES:
“The Silver Solution”
EPISODE NINE:     WRESTLING:
“Suckerslam XIV”
EPISODE EIGHT:     JANE AUSTEN ROMANCE:
“The Proud and the Senseless”
EPISODE SEVEN:     THE JAZZ AGE:
“The Bucky-Dusky-Ruby Red Hop!”
EPISODE SIX:     SUBMISSION:
“Re-Org”
EPISODE FIVE:     MASQUERADE:
“The Eyes Behind the Mask”
EPISODE FOUR:     SELF HELP:
“Sausage Stew for the Slightly Overweight Presents:
Some Several Suggestions Guaranteeing Success for the Mildly Neurotic”
EPISODE THREE:     NUDIST:
“If You Have To Ask ...”
EPISODE TWO:     FRENCH BEDROOM FARCE:
Un Nuit a Fifi’s!
EPISODE ONE:     STEAMPUNK:
“The Chase of the Purple Squid!”

A J.H.B. Original!